Dotaz na Eduard

[PantherG]

A on ten MiG-19 bude Dual, že tam je jedna sada čs. markingu málo????

P.S. Aleš R. mě předběhl....

[DominikS]

Finally managed to change the size of the photos that I can downolad them here.
I envlose photos of three Spitfires Mk.I where one can see gunsight bubbles in position characteristic for hydraulic pump.
And I also enclose two photos of No 92 squadron code latters. One shows GR-S with P/O Wright leaving the cocpit. The other the corrct shape of GR code letters. So far I've seen several decals that have them wrong (Model Alliance, Xtradecals and Victory Productions) but also three which have them right (Fundecals, DK Decals and one more from Czechia, but forgot the name). So I hope that the photos of No 92 squadron will be helpful.

Přílohy

GR-S as it actually looked like

Top picture shows lightbulbs (I know it's dark, but it's fro old book), so evidence of hydraulic pump

Here they are clearly visible

And here too

And correct shape of GR code letters.

[bitner]

Overtrees k 19 dela Trumpeter.

[DominikS]

One more thing about October Spitfires. GR-S couldn't be N3260 as such number wasn't allocated to Spitfires. According to one book it was N3250, and such aircraft did serve in No 92 sqn. And it had hand pump

Wysłane z mojego CPH1931 przy użyciu Tapatalka

EDIT. It was N3250 indeed, Checked in unit's ORB.

[Vl.Šulc]

Thank you, Dominik. However, once again, the profiles published in DNL are open jobs, not yet finished work. They are just previews for vendors to see what they may expect two months later, and they are not given for common publicity.

[Vl.Šulc]

No ono to nieuportí spodní křídlo je ve dvaasedmdesátině už dost titěrné a spolu s véčkovou vzpěrou a výplety už je to trochu piplačka. Zatímco na tu dlouhou tlustou vzpěru u Dr.I se křídla nacvaknou v podstatě sama (stavěl jsem obojí).

Já taky Nie 17 v 1/72 je z té trojice podle mě nejlepší, zatímco ve čtvrtce je zase nejlepší ten Dr.I. Ale jak je vidět, není to tak úplně nejdůležitější moment

[DominikS]

Thank you, Dominik. However, once again, the profiles published in DNL are open jobs, not yet finished work. They are just previews for vendors to see what they may expect two months later, and they are not given for common publicity.

You are welcome. I understand that these profiles are just preliminary but I think it's better to have more info than less.


Wysłane z mojego CPH1931 przy użyciu Tapatalka

[Vl.Šulc]

Thank you, Dominik. However, once again, the profiles published in DNL are open jobs, not yet finished work. They are just previews for vendors to see what they may expect two months later, and they are not given for common publicity.

You are welcome. I understand that these profiles are just preliminary but I think it's better to have more info than less.


Wysłane z mojego CPH1931 przy użyciu Tapatalka

We do have enough info, don´t wary

[DominikS]

I'm always worried when I see wrongly presented No 92 squadron's Spitfire.

Wysłane z mojego CPH1931 przy użyciu Tapatalka

[Martin Janoušek]

Dominik, you're getting as annoying as Atlis.

[DominikS]

Dominik, you're getting as annoying as Atlis.

Why? Is it because I am pointing basic mistakes? If it's a problem for you just don't read it.
One thing. I only write when I can say that this or that is wrong. If I don't have enough knowledge, I don't take part in discussion.
More, if someone can prove that I'm wrong, I can admit my mistake. It's no shame.
Spitfire is my favourite aircraft but I still learn new things. However, before I write or say anything I check all information.

It's not the first time Eduard make mistakes so as a buyer of their products I can criticize them.

Hezký den

Wysłane z mojego CPH1931 przy użyciu Tapatalka

[jfb]

Dominik, you're getting as annoying as Atlis.

Why? Is it because I am pointing basic mistakes? If it's a problem for you just don't read it.
One thing. I only write when I can say that this or that is wrong. If I don't have enough knowledge, I don't take part in discussion.
More, if someone can prove that I'm wrong, I can admit my mistake. It's no shame.
Spitfire is my favourite aircraft but I still learn new things. However, before I write or say anything I check all information.

It's not the first time Eduard make mistakes so as a buyer of their products I can criticize them.

Hezký den

Wysłane z mojego CPH1931 przy użyciu Tapatalka

You get the answer form Eudard, what do you want else?

[Vl.Šulc]

And do you think, Dominic, that anybody wants hear "It's not the first time he made mistakes"? Really? Do you lave something that hearing abou your work?

[DominikS]

I'm not Don Quixote and not going to fight the windmills. If no-one cares about it, I don't care too. If it's annoying that someone wants this model be even better, that's not my problem.
Mr Šulc, if someone criticize my work and show me where I make mistakes, I do accept such critics. I have no problems with this. And as a customer I have right to criticize Eduard's products. And Tamiya's, and Hasegawa's and Airfix's.

Wysłane z mojego CPH1931 przy użyciu Tapatalka

[jenda58]

Dominiku, ne každého zajímá 92. Sq. a možná ještě konkrétní kus.
Pane Šulci, na zakázku byste ho Dominikovi vyrobili? Pochopitelně za patřičný obnos.